The May 2002 issue of Fund Democracy Insights explains why the
time is right for a unified fee investment company (a structure proposed by
the SEC staff a decade ago), dissects the court's analysis in Vanguard v.
Standard & Poor's, and analyzes the ascendance of the superstar brand
in the field of index investing.
Table of Contents
May 2002
Links to resource materials (.pdf files require Adobe Acrobat
for viewing):
The Unified Fee Investment Company: Its Time Has Come
Vanguard v. Standard & Poor's: The Essential ETF
The Value of an Index
- S&P
500 Index Methodology, Standard & Poor’s (undated) (technical explanation
of the methodology used to create the S&P 500 index)
- General
Criteria for S&P U.S. Index Membership, Standard & Poor’s (Sep. 2000)
- U.S.
Benchmark Review, Standard & Poor's (Jan. 31, 2002)
- Floyd Norris,
Did Standard & Poor's Make a Mistake by Removing WorldCom from the 500?
New York Times (May 15, 2002) (available to New York Times subscribers)
- William
Harding, Is the S&P 500 Actively Managed? Morningstaradvisor.com (May
30, 2002)
- Karen Damato,
For Small-Cap Index Funds, The Devil's in the Benchmark, Wall Street Journal
(May 31, 2002) (discussing whether Russell 2000 or S&P 600 will provide
superior performance) (available to WSJ.com subscribers)
Worth Reading on the Internet
- Harvey
L. Pitt, Remarks Before the Investment Company Institute General Membership
Meeting (May 24, 2002)(general discussion of pending mutual fund-related
issues, including conflicts between hedge funds and mutual funds and 12b-1
fees)
- FPA
Applauds Merrill Lynch Settlement with New York; Requests SEC, States Move
‘Downstream’ in Investigation of Broker Conflicts, Financial Planning Association
(May 22, 2002) (analogizing analysts' conflicts of interest to brokers'
conflicts and reiterating FPA's opposition to the Merrill rule)
- Complaint,
Walter B. Hewlett, et. al v. Hewlett-Packard Company, C.A. No. 19513-NC
(Mar. 28 2002)
- Walter
B. Hewlett, et. al v. Hewlett-Packard Company, C.A. No. 19513-NC (Del. Ct.
Chancery Apr. 30, 2002)
- Baker
Calls Spitzer’s Rules ‘Illegitimate, Unenforceable, and a Cause for Confusion,”
Press Release, Office of U.S. Rep. Richard Baker (May 23, 2002) (arguing
that Spitzer’s negotiated settlement with Merrill Lynch exceeds proper scope
of his authority)
- Elizabeth
M. Knoblock, Hedge Fund Conflicts (Feb. 4, 2002)(discussing conflicts of
interest that arise in the management of hedge funds context)
Top