| Fund Democracy |
The November 2001 issue of Fund Democracy Insights proposes an alternative approach to the regulation of fund fees, discusses the differences between the federal and state conceptions of fund directors' roles, and evaluates the Gartenberg standard of review under section 36(b) in today's market.
Table of Contents - November 2001
On the Regulation of Fund Fees. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
The Role of Fund Directors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
Gartenberg Revisited . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .11
Worth Reading on the Internet . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
Links to resource materials (.pdf files require Adobe Acrobat for viewing):
On the Regulation of Fund Fees
Section 36(b) of the Investment Company Act
Section 15(c) of the Investment Company Act
Gartenberg v. Merrill Lynch Asset Management, Inc. 694 F.2d 923 (2d Cir. 1984)
John P. Freeman and Stewart L. Brown, Mutual Fund Advisory Fees: The Cost of Conflicts of Interest. 26 J. Corp. L. 609-673 (2001) (electronic version not available)
The Role of Mutual Fund Directors
Section 15(c) of the Investment Company Act, supra
Gartenberg, supra
Rule 2a-7 under the Investment Company Act
In the Matter of Parnassus Investments, Administrative Proceeding No. 3-9317 (Sep. 3, 1998)
Gartenberg Revisited
Gartenberg, supra
Section 15(c) of the Investment Company Act, supra
Section 36(b) of the Investment Company Act, supra
Form of Gartenberg Memorandum (Nov. 2, 1998)
Advisory Contract Renewal Services - 15(c) Reporting Requirements, Lipper
Worth Reading on the Internet
This page was last updated on Nov. 29, 2001.